| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Karol Trzcionka <karlikt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax |
| Date: | 2013-05-02 18:45:51 |
| Message-ID: | 29974.1367520351@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> Maybe we can make BEFORE and AFTER implied aliases rather than
> keywords. What say?
Well, they still have to be unreserved keywords for their use in
trigger-related commands, but as far as this feature is concerned
I think they're best off being handled as automatically-supplied
aliases. IOW the patch needn't touch gram.y at all.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-05-02 18:47:28 | Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax |
| Previous Message | Atri Sharma | 2013-05-02 18:44:57 | Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax |