From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade test script creates port conflicts in parallel testing |
Date: | 2013-01-03 22:57:01 |
Message-ID: | 3613.1357253821@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 01/03/2013 12:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Does anyone have an objection to fixing the pg_upgrade test script
>> to suppress the TCP socket?
> Should be OK. We can't do that on Windows, though, so please make it
> conditional so we don't break Mingw buildfarm members. The test script
> already contains a few Windows variants.
I'm planning to do it like this:
testhost=`uname -s`
+case $testhost in
+ MINGW*) LISTEN_ADDRESSES="localhost" ;;
+ *) LISTEN_ADDRESSES="" ;;
+esac
+
+POSTMASTER_OPTS="-F -c listen_addresses=$LISTEN_ADDRESSES"
+
temp_root=$PWD/tmp_check
which matches the existing Windows-specific switches.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Langille | 2013-01-04 02:01:01 | PGCon 2013 - CFP & unconference day |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2013-01-03 22:45:11 | Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation on "pg_database" |