From: | mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How much work is a native Windows application? |
Date: | 2002-05-09 17:24:03 |
Message-ID: | 3CDAB0B3.C7375A12@mohawksoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com wrote:
>
> > I think, and I know people are probably sick of me spouting opinions,
> > that if you want a Windows presence for PostgreSQL, then we should
> > write a real Win32 version.
>
> The crucial wrong word is the word "we."
>
> If _you_ want a Windows presence, then _you_ should write a real Win32
> version. That clearly attaches responsibility to someone who is interested.
I have already said that I am willing to write the pieces for a Windows port.
The issue is changes in PostgreSQL required to do it.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Wampler | 2002-05-09 17:29:29 | Re: How much work is a native Windows application? |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2002-05-09 17:09:24 | Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy |