| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, sugita(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata |
| Date: | 2002-07-31 23:09:12 |
| Message-ID: | 3D486E18.6B7C086A@fourpalms.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
...
> I thought they were in /contrib because we didn't want them by default
> in the admin's path. They have to go looking for them to use them. Is
> that still a valid concern?
May be a valid concern, but not the right solution.
If we are that worried about misuse, then we should have them print a
banner and prompt for confirmation. And have them accept a "-q" to just
shut up and do it.
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-01 01:17:47 | Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-07-31 22:24:20 | Re: prepareable statements |