| From: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| Date: | 2003-06-23 06:46:51 |
| Message-ID: | 3EF6A25B.9060105@mascari.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>Basically, the subordinate must be willing to hold its breath *forever*.
>
>
> Yep. And if the cohort crashes while waiting for the coordinator to
> come back on-line, if I understand the world correctly, it must be
> capable of committing the database changes associated with the
> COMMIT-VOTE response it supplied to the coordinator's PREPARE. It
> seems this would require REDO? And yet there are thousands of
> installed distributed databases running enterprises every day.
Please ignore the REDO remark. It's late where I am...
Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Enke, Michael | 2003-06-23 08:02:46 | Re: [HACKERS] again: Bug #943: Server-Encoding from EUC_TW toutf-8 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-06-23 06:09:10 | Re: [HACKERS] MARKED_FOR_UPDATE && XMAX_COMMITTED == XMAX_INVALID ? |