From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | db encoding |
Date: | 2003-10-06 17:35:52 |
Message-ID: | 3F81A7F8.5080208@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers Postg스포츠 토토 결과SQL : |
pg_encoding appears to have 2 personalities, (name=>number and vice
versa) depending on whther or not its parameter begins with a digit
(which is in itself fragile - what if you gave it "3foo"?).
However, from an initdb POV I am assuming that we are only interested in
the name=>number conversion, even though initdb.sh does no apparent
checking on the parameter it is passing to pg_encoding. Please tell me
if this is incorrect.
thanks
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-06 17:47:55 | Re: db encoding |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-06 17:26:35 | Re: max_connections/shared_buffers (was Re: Beta4 Tag'd and Bundled ...) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-06 17:47:55 | Re: db encoding |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-06 16:01:38 | signals on windows |