| From: | Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chrisking(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pdxpug(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic! |
| Date: | 2006-09-20 17:53:25 |
| Message-ID: | 3caa6e8d47fb20ae63db2d13025fb28a@chrisking.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pdxpug |
On Sep 20, 2006, at 10:29 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2006, at 09:03, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
>
>> The general consensus was that she should upgrade. We didn't have a
>> clear answer to why the query was so slow in the older version, but
>> it was clear that it was faster in the newer version of postgresql.
>
> Actually, I think that the consensus was that she should try
> increasing the sort_mem on the 7.4 database to see if that helps. But
> upgrading is a no-brainer, too. :-)
Oh, right! I remember that now. Thanks!
happy to be in consensus for real this time,
-selena
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2006-09-20 17:54:26 | Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic! |
| Previous Message | Randal L. Schwartz | 2006-09-20 17:33:31 | Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic! |