From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Non-blocking communication between a frontend and a backend (pqcomm) |
Date: | 2009-07-27 07:56:06 |
Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0907270056x3d26b8dev3e8c012b325eeb9e@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> OK, I agree, I can't see what this is for either from the code that is
> here. I think I read a little more meaning into the title of the
> patch than was actually there. It seems like the appropriate thing to
> do is mark this returned with feedback, so I'm going to go do that.
OK. I'll change and resubmit the patch with Synch Rep which uses it
in the next CommitFest.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-07-27 08:17:58 | Re: autogenerating headers & bki stuff |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2009-07-27 07:13:27 | Re: Review: support for multiplexing SIGUSR1 |