| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alex J(dot) Avriette" <alex(at)posixnap(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Very large scale postgres support |
| Date: | 2004-02-08 19:07:14 |
| Message-ID: | 402688E2.9080108@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alex J. Avriette wrote:
>
>I feel that it would be a very good thing if some thinking on this
>subject was done. In the future, people will hopefully begin using
>postgres for more intense applications. We are looking at perhaps many
>tens of billions of transactions per day within the next year or two.
>
>
tens of billions =10e10 per day? This is probably a typo, because this
would mean > 100,000 requests per second? Do you want to feed a monitor
with pixel data right from the database, using individual queries for
each pixel? Or record each irc user's keyclick in the world concurrently
online in a single database?
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-02-08 19:52:17 | Re: session persistent data for plperl |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-08 19:00:05 | Re: session persistent data for plperl |