From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Date: | 2004-02-26 20:41:26 |
Message-ID: | 403E59F6.7000600@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers Postg토토 결과SQL : Postg토토 pgsql-www |
Josh Berkus wrote:
>Peter,
>
>
>
>>So yes, I
>>think this is a reasonable plan, just don't expect "collaboration" to
>>suddenly appear out of nowhere.
>>
>>
>
>Yeah. As my grandfather used to say, "You can lead a horse to water, but you
>can't make him shrink." (granddad is under care, now).
>
>Everyone: Further data: if we prefer BugZilla to GForge's lighter-weight bug
>tracking, it turns out that there is a BZ plug-in for GForge.
>
>
Perhaps when BZ supports PG - some progress is being made on that front,
but it's not a done deal yet.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Costa | 2004-02-26 21:03:36 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-26 20:32:05 | Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Costa | 2004-02-26 21:03:36 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2004-02-26 20:38:47 | Re: ORDER BY different locales |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Costa | 2004-02-26 21:03:36 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-26 20:28:44 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexey Borzov | 2004-02-26 20:48:56 | Re: Upgraded Site..any news ? |
Previous Message | David Costa | 2004-02-26 20:31:17 | Upgraded Site..any news ? |