| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: width_bucket() per SQL2003 (WIP) |
| Date: | 2004-04-30 05:46:37 |
| Message-ID: | 4091E83D.5030407@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> Other than "it's in SQL2003", what's the point of implementing this?
> It seems like a mighty marginal feature ...
I don't see a problem with implementing every function that SQL2003
has...isn't that the point of implementing the standard?
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-04-30 06:04:06 | Re: width_bucket() per SQL2003 (WIP) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-04-30 05:27:10 | Re: FW: Timezone library |