From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Change < to -f in examples with input files |
Date: | 2005-02-22 09:25:03 |
Message-ID: | 421AFA6F.9060400@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
>>Uh, how is it more expressive? The only difference I see is the
>>line numbers. Is that it?
>
>
> That could be a very big deal in case of error on a large file, so
> yes.
In IRC, I always recommend that ppl use -f, since it's so much more
useful :)
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Cave-Ayland | 2005-02-22 10:14:08 | Re: WIP: bufmgr rewrite per recent discussions |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-02-22 05:07:53 | Re: pgsql: Use _() macro consistently rather than gettext(). |