| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Current CVS parallel test lock |
| Date: | 2005-03-09 15:17:45 |
| Message-ID: | 422F1399.5060004@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>Do you have a way to revert to the old installation to check whether
>>the checks fail again? It might be useful to track down exactly
>>what happened. It seems wrong that a currently-installed version
>>should have adverse effects on a just-built version's regression
>>tests.
>
>
> We've seen that happen many times with shared library dependencies
> ... but libpq hasn't changed in the last few days AFAIR.
I hadn't done a gmake install for months due to being overseas...
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | pgsql | 2005-03-09 15:38:27 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-09 14:22:21 | Re: Current CVS parallel test lock |