| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] number of attributes in page files? |
| Date: | 2002-10-11 12:12:50 |
| Message-ID: | 4295.1034338370@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com> writes:
> Is it possible to get rid of the "t_natts" fields in the tuple header?
> Is this field only for "alter table add/drop" support?
"Only"? A lot of people consider that pretty important ...
But removing 2 bytes isn't going to save anything, on most machines,
because of alignment considerations.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | snpe | 2002-10-11 12:27:40 | Re: Out of memory error on huge resultset |
| Previous Message | Anuradha Ratnaweera | 2002-10-11 11:15:00 | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mario Weilguni | 2002-10-11 14:00:13 | Re: [HACKERS] number of attributes in page files? |
| Previous Message | Mario Weilguni | 2002-10-11 08:44:03 | Compile test with gcc 3.2 |