| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rysdam <drysdam(at)ll(dot)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Not clear on what PQgetResult does |
| Date: | 2005-11-17 21:40:37 |
| Message-ID: | 437CF8D5.6050804@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
>
> To be honest, this is almost enough to drive me away from PG. But I
> like everything else about it, so I could perhaps give a patch a
> whirl. Or are there underlying server reasons why this won't work?
I thought (I could be wrong) that tom said that the support was in the
protocol but that libpq did not support it, so I would guess there is no
reason
except that there is no patch.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Lamb | 2005-11-17 22:04:26 | Re: Incremental results from libpq |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-17 21:39:24 | Re: Not clear on what PQgetResult does |