| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Pollard, Mike" <mpollard(at)cincom(dot)com>, Bill Bartlett <bbartlett(at)softwareanalytics(dot)com>, Fredrik Olsson <fredrik(dot)olsson(at)treyst(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: MS SQL Server compatibility functions |
| Date: | 2005-11-24 10:56:41 |
| Message-ID: | 43859C69.9040408@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Why do you use "GRANT ALL" and not "GRANT SELECT, UPDATE"? All means everybody
> can do bad things with those sequences.
GRANT ALL on a sequence IS GRANT SELECT & UPDATE.
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A. Kretschmer | 2005-11-24 11:24:50 | Re: Private email requests |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-11-24 10:13:14 | Re: BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept |