| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, mboscia <mboscia(at)cymer(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production |
| Date: | 2005-12-03 03:33:21 |
| Message-ID: | 43911201.2010406@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>>cyspec=# vacuum freeze pg_catalog.pg_class;
>>ERROR: failed to re-find parent key in "pg_class_relname_nsp_index"
>
>>It seems that we cannot vacuum pg_class, because vacuum itself fails.
>>Any suggestions on how to bootstrap the fixing of pg_class?
>
> REINDEX?
>
As usual, sage advice. That worked -- thanks.
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-03 04:25:23 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-03 03:08:59 | Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database |