From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor(at)dunaweb(dot)hu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SERIAL type feature request |
Date: | 2005-12-05 01:57:21 |
Message-ID: | 43939E81.1020109@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I think nobody would object to implementing support for the SQL2003
> syntax. Most of that would be providing all the values that will get
> forwarded into the internal sequence generation during CREATE TABLE.
Someone also pointed out on IRC the other day that Oracle and DB2 list
'identity' as the column type of identity columns in the
information_schema, whereas we just put 'integer'. Maybe we could
change that to match in the future...
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-05 02:50:15 | port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype) |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-12-05 01:27:03 | Re: Reducing relation locking overhead |