| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness |
| Date: | 2002-08-09 13:50:13 |
| Message-ID: | 446.1028901013@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> If you apply the pg_stat_reset() function patch you get this regression
> failure. Is this because it's returning a bool I guess? Shall I just fix
> the regression test to exclude this function?
No, you should fix the function definition. The sanity checks are there
for a reason.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-09 14:33:22 | Re: CREATE TEMP TABLE .... ON COMMIT |
| Previous Message | Daniel Lyons | 2002-08-09 10:57:16 | OOP real life example (was Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |