| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Locale + encoding combinations |
| Date: | 2007-10-10 08:51:33 |
| Message-ID: | 470C9295.6060805@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2007 schrieb Dave Page:
>> Latin1 is a perfectly valid encoding for my locale English_United
>> Kingdom. It is accepted by setlocale for LC_ALL.
>>
>> Why does initdb reject it? Why does it insist the encoding is not valid
>> for the locale?
>
> Because initdb works with a finite list of known matches, and your particular
> combination might not be in that list -- yet.
So is it just a case of us generating a list of matches that may be
Windows specific, or is there more to it than that?
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paesold | 2007-10-10 09:04:34 | Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher |
| Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2007-10-10 08:50:12 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |