| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? |
| Date: | 2005-12-06 17:03:14 |
| Message-ID: | 4748.1133888594@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> OK, AndrewSN just pointed out that it's "documented" to work like that...
> ...still seems bizarre...
It seems reasonably consistent to me. extract() doesn't consider
seconds and fractional seconds to be distinct fields: it's all one
value. The milliseconds and microseconds options just shift the
decimal place for you.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-06 17:09:19 | Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-12-06 16:48:40 | Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? |