From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
Date: | 2007-12-07 16:08:30 |
Message-ID: | 47596FFE.9090903@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs Postg무지개 토토SQL |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> Historically, the only way to troubleshoot some of the contrib modules
>> was to e-mail the author. If people think that we've reached a standard
>> that everything in /contrib is now well-documented and supported by the
>> general community, the I suppose we don't need contact information. I'm
>> not so sure myself.
>
> I do not think that we should encourage people to mail the authors first
> rather than pgsql-bugs. For one thing, a lot of those addresses are
> dead, and some of the ones that aren't don't respond especially fast.
>
> If the community-at-large can't handle a bug, we certainly have enough
> institutional memory to try to contact the original author, even if that
> address isn't in the SGML docs.
>
Perhaps the at a minimum the email goes in the commit?
Joshua D. Drake
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-12-07 17:03:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
Previous Message | Albert Cervera i Areny | 2007-12-07 07:51:59 | Re: "distributed checkpoint" |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-12-07 17:03:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-07 16:03:40 | Re: Possible PostgreSQL 8.3beta4 bug with MD5 authentication in psql? |