| From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Headers dependencies cleanup |
| Date: | 2008-04-07 20:32:21 |
| Message-ID: | 47FA84D5.5090000@sun.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera napsal(a):
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>
>> PS: Is there any reason to do not start to use inline functions instead
>> of macros in some cases?
>
> Not all compilers like (== support) inline macros apparently.
Is it your assumption or do you mean some specific compiler? IIRC, inline is
defined in C99 and my assumption :-) is that it should be supported by all
compilers today. I try to look on buildmachine, There should be some useful
configure output.
Zdenek
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2008-04-07 20:46:52 | Re: Database owner installable modules patch |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-07 20:20:20 | Re: Headers dependencies cleanup |