Re: BUG #4465: GROUP BY is not to SQL standard

Tony Marston wrote:
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 4465
> Logged by: Tony Marston
> Email address: tony(at)marston-home(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk
> PostgreSQL version: 8.3.4
> Operating system: Windows XP
> Description: GROUP BY is not to SQL standard
> Details:
>
> The Postgresql implementation of GROUP BY does not conform to either the
> 1999 or 2003 SQL standard. The documentation states that every field in the
> SELECT list which is not aggregated must be specified in the GROUP BY
> clause. While this was true in the 1992 standard, in 1999 this was changed
> to "any non-aggregated column appearing in the SELECT list is functionally
> dependent upon the GROUP BY clause". In the example both p.name and p.price
> are functionally dependent on product_id, therefore there is no need for
> them to be included in the GROUP BY clause.

SQL 2003 (and similarly 1999) also says

"""
Without Feature T301, “Functional dependencies”, in conforming SQL
language, if T is a grouped table,
then in each <value expression> contained in the <select list>, each
<column reference> that references a
column of T shall reference a grouping column or be specified in an
aggregated argument of a <set function
specification>.
"""

and as you can read in the documentation
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/unsupported-features-sql-standard.html)
PostgreSQL does not support feature T301.

Therefore the implemented behavior is not "wrong", but it could arguably
be enhanced.