| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? |
| Date: | 2005-12-06 17:19:58 |
| Message-ID: | 4915.1133889598@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Why aren't 'minutes' considered too? Because they aren't 'seconds'.
> Well, seconds aren't microseconds either.
Yeah, they are: it's just one field. The other way of looking at it
(that everything is seconds) is served by "extract(epoch)".
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-06 17:34:32 | more locale problems on Windows |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-06 17:09:19 | Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? |