| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
| Cc: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: parallel restore vs. windows |
| Date: | 2008-12-24 22:58:29 |
| Message-ID: | 4952BE95.5000900@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> This version completes properly on Windows with the regression database.
>>
>>
>
> actually, this one doesn't apply cleanly on head
>
I will have a new patch a day or two after Christmas, which I hope will
be very close to being fully done.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2008-12-24 23:46:17 | Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-12-24 22:11:15 | Re: parallel restore vs. windows |