| From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Frames vs partitions: is SQL2008 completely insane? |
| Date: | 2008-12-27 18:32:10 |
| Message-ID: | 495674AA.8050706@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> 2008/12/28 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> "Hitoshi Harada" <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> 2008/12/27 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>>>> which doesn't conform to spec AFAICS ...
>>> ....4.15...says:
>> interesting...6.10 general rule 1b, which very clearly states ...
>> ... 4.15 does seem like evidence that the spec authors may
>> have misspoke in 6.10
> Oracle... results are: ... which means the section 4.15 is true
ISTM ISO should hire you guys (or the postgres project as a whole)
to proof-read their specs before they publish them.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Chernow | 2008-12-27 18:50:13 | Re: new libpq SSL connection option |
| Previous Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2008-12-27 16:19:31 | Re: Frames vs partitions: is SQL2008 completely insane? |