From: | Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands |
Date: | 2008-07-02 23:39:01 |
Message-ID: | 499E960B-58C4-4D76-AF06-C5D6AF176A1D@decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 2, 2008, at 1:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> ... So it's just 7.3 that's worth debating, I think.
>
>> EOL is EOL, why is the question even being asked?
>
> Well, pg_dump still supports servers back to 7.0 (and yes I do test
> that
> now and again). psql probably doesn't need to support interactive
> query
> operations quite so far back, but I think the boundary of what's
> needed
> is pretty squishy. Hence my query about what people really want.
Being able to get your data out of 7.3 is a lot more important than
\d commands... :)
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Decibel! | 2008-07-02 23:47:41 | Re: Location for pgstat.stat |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-02 23:19:03 | Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level |