| From: | Stephen Cook <sclists(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion |
| Date: | 2009-12-07 22:36:43 |
| Message-ID: | 4B1D837B.1090400@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We have a very unfortunate naming situation with Jeff Davis's new
> feature, namely the shorter name, which is one permutation away from
> an existing and entirely unrelated feature: Constraint Exclusion,
> which has to do with queries over partitioned tables and like
> entities.
>
> Renaming it, which I believe we should do Really Soon(TM), to Operator
> [Exclusion] Constraints would fix this problem.
>
> Cheers,
> David.
+1
I thought I was just too dumb to follow the conversation.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-07 22:57:11 | Re: Adding support for SE-Linux security |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-12-07 22:06:35 | Re: Writeable CTE patch |