| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jason DiCioccio <jd(at)ods(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Josh Livni <josh(at)umbrellaconsulting(dot)com>, SF Postgres <sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts? |
| Date: | 2009-12-10 19:59:39 |
| Message-ID: | 4B21532B.8050306@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | sfpug |
> Just to clarify, Joyent does this too, no? Or is it just that the
> Solaris scheduler handles the prioritization of tasks/resources
> better? I haven't yet had the chance to use Joyent, but I thought
> this was one of their selling points.
It depends on the size of your instance. If you're using a whole CPU
(not core, CPU) Joyent can dedicate that CPU to you and nobody else can
touch it. One of the advantages of Solaris over Xen.
--Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brian Ghidinelli | 2009-12-10 20:05:49 | Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts? |
| Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2009-12-10 19:56:58 | Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts? |