From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration |
Date: | 2010-03-01 22:32:01 |
Message-ID: | 4B8C4061.80905@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/28/10 7:12 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> However, I'd still like to hear from someone with the requisite
>> > technical knowledge whether capturing and retrying the current query in
>> > a query cancel is even possible.
>
> I'm not sure who you want to hear from here, but I think that's a dead end.
"dead end" as in "too hard to implement"? Or for some other reason?
It's undeniable that auto-retry would be better from a user's
perspective than a user-visible cancel. So if it's *reasonable* to
implement, I think we should be working on it. I'm also very puzzled as
to why nobody else wants to even discuss it; it's like some wierd blackout.
--Josh Berkus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2010-03-01 22:36:08 | Re: function side effects |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-03-01 21:49:53 | Re: scheduler in core |