| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-testers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: vacuum in pg9beta4 much slower than in 8.4 |
| Date: | 2010-08-16 17:12:25 |
| Message-ID: | 4C697179.5080906@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-testers |
> Yes, I run the tests on clean tables. I run VACUUM FULL, and after that
> I mesured how long it takes for VACUUM ANALYZE and VACUUM ANALYZE FULL.
> So, it is ok for VACUUM FULL (on clean tables) on 9.0b4 to be six times
> slower than on 8.4. But is it ok for plain VACUUM to be two times slower?
On clean or on dirty tables?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jai Soni | 2010-08-25 06:49:40 | feature request in postgresql 9.0 release |
| Previous Message | Mario Splivalo | 2010-08-16 09:34:01 | Re: vacuum in pg9beta4 much slower than in 8.4 |