From: | Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Docs: Make notes on sequences and rollback more obvious |
Date: | 2012-08-04 04:56:28 |
Message-ID: | 501CAB7C.2030502@ringerc.id.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/04/2012 04:12 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I haven't reviewed it in detail but noticed an apparent editing error:
> "which are used the counters" should probably have an "as" thrown in
> there. Or something.
Thanks. Editing fail. I revised that spot repeatedly to try to keep it
short and simple without in any way implying that SEQUENCEs are *only*
used for SERIAL columns.
Fixed attached.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
belabour-the-point-on-sequence-rollback.diff | text/x-patch | 5.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2012-08-04 06:18:33 | Re: Issue in Behavior of Interval Datatype |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-03 20:18:03 | Re: Issue in Behavior of Interval Datatype |