From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: xlog filename formatting functions in recovery |
Date: | 2012-09-21 07:25:55 |
Message-ID: | 505C1683.9000808@vmware.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | Postg토토 꽁 머니SQL |
On 03.07.2012 15:13, Robert Haas wrote:
> On the substance of the patch, I believe the reason why this is
> currently disallowed is because the TLI is implicitly taken from the
> running system, and on the standby that might be the wrong value.
Yeah, I believe that's the reason. So the question is, what timeline
should the functions use on a standby? With the patch as it is, they use 0:
postgres=# select pg_xlogfile_name_offset('3/FF020000');
pg_xlogfile_name_offset
-----------------------------------
(0000000000000003000000FF,131072)
(1 row)
There's a few different options:
1. current recovery_target_timeline (XLogCtl->recoveryTargetTLI)
2. current ThisTimeLineID, which is bumped every time a timeline-bumping
checkpoint record is replayed. (this is not currently visible to
backends, but we could easily add a shared memory variable for it)
3. curFileTLI. That is, the TLI of the current file that we're
replaying. This is usually the same as ThisTimeLineID, except when
replaying a WAL segment where the timeline changes
4. Something else?
What do you use these functions for? Which option would make the most sense?
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shigeru HANADA | 2012-09-21 08:24:59 | Re: proposal - assign result of query to psql variable |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2012-09-21 05:47:38 | Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) |