| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation on "pg_database" |
| Date: | 2013-01-04 18:07:37 |
| Message-ID: | 50E71A69.8050403@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg토토 커뮤니티SQL |
On 1/3/13 3:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> It's true, as we've often
> said here, that leveraging the OS facilities means that we get the
> benefit of improving OS facilities "for free" - but it also means that
> we never exceed what the OS facilities are able to provide.
And that should be the deciding factor, shouldn't it? Clearly, the OS
timestamps do not satisfy the requirements of tracking database object
creation times.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-01-04 18:13:59 | Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-04 18:07:34 | Re: enhanced error fields |