| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Suggested new CF status: "Pending Discussion" |
| Date: | 2013-03-03 21:31:53 |
| Message-ID: | 5133C149.6030509@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Folks,
I'd like to add a new CF status, "Pending Discussion". This status
would be used for patches which have long discussions regarding syntax
or difficult functionality on this list which must be resolved before
commit. Examples include SELECT INTO STRICT and Matviews WIP.
Currently these patches are kind of randomly listed as "waiting on
author", "waiting for review", or even "ready for commit".
Thoughts/objections/approval?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-03-03 21:35:03 | Partial patch status update, 3/3/13 |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-03-03 21:17:09 | Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3 |