| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Enabling Checksums |
| Date: | 2013-03-04 08:36:49 |
| Message-ID: | 51345D21.6010104@vmware.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04.03.2013 09:11, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Are there objectors?
FWIW, I still think that checksumming belongs in the filesystem, not
PostgreSQL. If you go ahead with this anyway, at the very least I'd like
to see some sort of a comparison with e.g btrfs. How do performance,
error-detection rate, and behavior on error compare? Any other metrics
that are relevant here?
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-03-04 09:05:17 | Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-03-04 08:21:09 | Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |