From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |
Date: | 2004-08-09 04:14:30 |
Message-ID: | 5305.1092024870@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> If a relative path is used for the -L option in initdb, the following fatal
> error happens:
7.4 fails in the same way, and probably every prior release too.
The problem is that the backend has done a chdir into the template1
subdirectory, so paths that are relative from your perspective
no longer apply.
It might be worth absolut-izing this path in initdb before it's
passed down, but I can't get exceedingly excited about it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sube Singh | 2004-08-09 16:00:27 | Installation of PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-08-09 01:56:14 | 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | markir | 2004-08-09 05:37:29 | Re: PITR on Win32 - Archive and Restore |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-08-09 03:37:50 | Re: PITR on Win32 - Archive and Restore |