| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure" |
| Date: | 2014-03-12 03:52:47 |
| Message-ID: | 531FDA0F.5090407@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/11/2014 11:50 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> But not sure how to define a unique
>> index that allows (joe, db1) to coexist with (joe, db2) but not with
>> (joe, 0).
>>
> and why you want that restriction? when you login you need to specify
> the db, right? if you don't specify the db then is the global 'joe'
> that want to login
>
You can't login without specifying a db. Every session is connected to a db.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2014-03-12 04:05:41 | Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure" |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2014-03-12 03:50:28 | Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure" |