| From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position |
| Date: | 2015-01-20 20:32:54 |
| Message-ID: | 54BEBB76.6090708@BlueTreble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/20/15 11:12 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I am sending updated version - it allow third optional argument that specify where searching should to start. With it is possible repeatably call this function.
What happened to returning an array of offsets? I think that would be both easier to use than this version as well as performing better.
I see you dropped multi-dimension support, but I think that's fine.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-01-20 20:39:23 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-01-20 20:24:00 | Re: Merging postgresql.conf and postgresql.auto.conf |