| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: generic builtin functions |
| Date: | 2005-12-09 01:26:45 |
| Message-ID: | 5523.1134091605@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I see in that discussion you say:
>> Every rowtype Datum will carry its own concrete type.
> Are we storing that on disk in every composite object?
Yup. For a rowtype datum it's not a serious overhead. I realize
that the same is not true of enums :-(
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Trent Shipley | 2005-12-09 01:29:01 | Re: [PATCHES] Inherited Constraints |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2005-12-09 00:20:59 | Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? |