From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes |
Date: | 2021-01-15 08:53:05 |
Message-ID: | 55526d79-247d-83a1-0961-7d42e0db1870@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-12-08 10:38, vignesh C wrote:
> I have implemented printing of backtrace based on handling it in
> CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS. This patch also includes the change to allow
> getting backtrace of any particular process based on the suggestions.
> Attached patch has the implementation for the same.
> Thoughts?
Are we willing to use up a signal for this?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-01-15 08:59:02 | Re: Occasional tablespace.sql failures in check-world -jnn |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2021-01-15 08:47:41 | Re: list of extended statistics on psql |