| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Adding a pg_get_owned_sequence function? |
| Date: | 2023-09-01 17:31:43 |
| Message-ID: | 562330.1693589503@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I wonder if it'd be possible to just remove pg_get_serial_sequence().
A quick search at http://codesearch.debian.net/ finds uses of it
in packages like gdal, qgis, rails, ... We could maybe get rid of
it after a suitable deprecation period, but I think we can't just
summarily remove it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-09-01 17:41:41 | Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables |
| Previous Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2023-09-01 17:26:56 | GenBKI emits useless open;close for catalogs without rows |