| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pokurev(at)pm(dot)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, bannos(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp |
| Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. |
| Date: | 2016-03-07 10:18:16 |
| Message-ID: | 56DD5568.5070902@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/03/07 19:11, Amit Langote wrote:
> we should re-introduce[1] a fixed-size char st_progress_message[] field.
Sorry, that [1] does not refer to anything, just a leftover from my draft.
I thought I had a link handy for an email where some sort of
justification was given as to why st_progress_message field was removed
from the patch. I couldn't find it.
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-03-07 10:28:55 | Re: Greeting for coming back, and where is PostgreSQL going |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2016-03-07 10:11:03 | Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. |