| From: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Greg Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict |
| Date: | 2008-12-01 16:05:59 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070812010805y1e390982nab6fdafdd918f776@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Another point here is that we have always accepted single digits in dates:
portal=> select '2008-11-1'::date;
date
------------
2008-11-01
(1 row)
portal=> select '2008-1-11'::date;
date
------------
2008-01-11
(1 row)
If we're going to handle dates and timestamps inconsistently, there
should be a good reason for it.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2008-12-01 16:13:16 | Re: Windowing Function Patch Review -> Standard Conformance |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-12-01 15:50:35 | Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict |