| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta |
| Date: | 2010-05-19 17:52:20 |
| Message-ID: | 60451.209.226.93.226.1274291540.squirrel@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 19, 2010 1:31 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, standard_conforming_strings is really a different case because of
> the SQL-injection security hazards with non-scs-aware client code.
> I don't see any comparable risk for bytea format.
>
Yeah, and the impact of this will be much more limited. I'd want quite a
bit of convincing to agree that we shouldn't turn it on right away.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-19 18:03:38 | Re: Building the 64-bit Postgres |
| Previous Message | BRUSSER Michael | 2010-05-19 17:48:16 | Building the 64-bit Postgres |