From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Scott Cain <cain(at)cshl(dot)org>, PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] EXTERNAL storage and substring on long strings |
Date: | 2003-08-14 18:00:21 |
Message-ID: | 6311.1060884021@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance pgsql-sql |
Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Doesn't look that unrealistic to me. A plain text based substring
> function will reassemble the whole beast first before cutting out the
> wanted part. His manually chunked version will read only those chunks
> needed.
So does substr(), if applied to EXTERNAL (non-compressed) toasted text.
See John Gray's improvements a release or two back.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-08-14 18:04:58 | Re: Vacuum performance question |
Previous Message | Jeremy M. Guthrie | 2003-08-14 17:55:32 | Vacuum performance question |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Cain | 2003-08-14 18:11:07 | Re: [SQL] EXTERNAL storage and substring on long strings |
Previous Message | Christoph Haller | 2003-08-14 15:18:03 | Re: Changing data type must recreate all views? |