| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Key word table update for SQL:2008 |
| Date: | 2008-11-26 13:33:17 |
| Message-ID: | 6892.1227706397@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I was planning to update the key words table
> (http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-keywords-appendix.html)
> for SQL:2008 and was wondering whether there is interest in keeping the
> SQL-92 through SQL:2003 columns. It might look a bit overloaded then.
> Comments?
Perhaps the most useful thing would be to keep SQL-92 and latest, so
as to show the "full range" in what's been reserved or not in different
spec revisions.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2008-11-26 14:36:39 | Re: New XML-based man page build |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-11-26 11:32:12 | Re: New XML-based man page build |