| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "pgsql-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Transaction start in pg_stat_activity |
| Date: | 2006-11-20 15:58:02 |
| Message-ID: | 6940.1164038282@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Great idea. Would it be appropriate to show the time the current
> snapshot was taken also/instead?
There is no way we are putting a gettimeofday() call into
GetSnapshotData. I thought you were focused on performance??
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-20 16:08:03 | Re: Accessing shared memory in a proc_exit callback |
| Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-11-20 15:35:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-20 16:25:11 | Re: Transaction start in pg_stat_activity |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-20 10:02:27 | Re: Transaction start in pg_stat_activity |