| From: | Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Feature Request: pg_replication_master() |
| Date: | 2012-12-20 22:30:32 |
| Message-ID: | 697065586.155396.1356042632554.JavaMail.root@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andreas,
> Do you want the node one step up or the top-level in the chain?
> Because
> I don't think we can do the latter without complicating the
> replication
> protocol noticably.
Well, clearly a whole chain would be nice for the user. But even just one step up would be very useful.
--Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | McDevitt, Charles | 2012-12-20 23:12:55 | Re: Parser Cruft in gram.y |
| Previous Message | Joshua Berkus | 2012-12-20 22:28:43 | Re: Cascading replication: should we detect/prevent cycles? |